This Book Is Not Sold Online - Inquire In Store
Usually Ships in 1-5 Days
During the late 1960s and early 1970s, in response to the political turbulence generated by the Vietnam War, an important group of American artists and critics sought to expand the definition of creative labor by identifying themselves as “art workers.” In the first book to examine this movement, Julia Bryan-Wilson shows how a polemical redefinition of artistic labor played a central role in minimalism, process art, feminist criticism, and conceptualism. In her close examination of four seminal figures of the period—American artists Carl Andre, Robert Morris, and Hans Haacke, and art critic Lucy Lippard—Bryan-Wilson frames an engrossing new argument around the double entendre that “art works.” She traces the divergent ways in which these four artists and writers rallied around the “art worker” identity, including participating in the Art Workers' Coalition—a short-lived organization founded in 1969 to protest the war and agitate for artists' rights—and the New York Art Strike. By connecting social art history and theories of labor, this book illuminates the artworks and protest actions that were central to this pivotal era in both American art and politics.
A Best Book of 2009, Artforum Magazine
About the Author
Julia Bryan-Wilson is Associate Professor of Art History at the University of California, Irvine.
“Of immediate, practical value to young artists today who want to re-establish art as an alternative place in the culture, though her clean prose will also make the book inviting to more casual readers.”
“[A] smart new study. . . . Bryan-Wilson applies her numerous insights with care.”
“A vivid picture of artistic activism, essential both for the art history of the 1960s and for today’s discourse on art and politics.”
— Carrie Lambert-Beatty, Harvard University
"Superior study.... highly recommended"
“Tackles the political self-identification of artists with aplomb.”
“An extremely nuanced reading of the seminal company’s comedy output. . . . Reinvigorates leftist critiques of the American film industry.”